Since releasing Akka.NET 1.1 I’ve been spending more time sharpening the saw here at Petabridge. Combing over the ways we spend our time and money and quantifying the returns that provides to us and to our customers. As it turns out, quantifying this is rather difficult for reasons that are all-too-common in the business world: data silos.

Our “business output” is measured and recorded in a number of disparate, disconnected, off-the-shelf systems. For example: We record our sales through Stripe and Quickbooks Online, but we never correlate them with the end-user interactions with Akka.NET Bootcamp, our YouTube videos, or our blog.

We want a complete picture of what really lead to a sale or to a successful deployment of Akka.NET, because that helps tell us what were good investments of our resources. So in order to do this I started designing a business intelligence application called “Brute” designed to perpetually stream information from all of these sources into a consolidated view. The first version of it is extremely simple but we have plans to expand what it does and the number of systems it can connect to.

Designing an Akka.NET Application

I decided that “Brute” presented a good opportunity for Petabridge to dogfood Akka.NET, especially some of the new modules such as Akka.Streams and Akka.Cluster.Sharding. Thus I’ve spent the past few weeks in the design process writing specifications, models, and documentation.

Protocol-Driven Design

Here’s the catch with designing an Akka.NET application, or really, any actor-based application: your actors aren’t the correct place to begin the design.

Instead, you always want to start the design of any Akka.NET application with the flow of events and information that go through it.

Petabridge customer event flow

Certified Akka.NET Builds and Akka.NET Support Plans

Petabridge Now Offers Certified Builds, Developer Support, and Production Support for Akka.NET

More and more companies are choosing to use Akka.NET each day to fulfill mission-critical workloads in tons of different business domains: finance, health care, fleet and vehicle tracking, energy, and more.

Beginning today Petabridge is pleased to offer these companies Akka.NET certified builds, developer support, and production support to give them additional tools for getting the job done with Akka.NET in production.

Certified Akka.NET Build

Akka.NET certified builds and support plans

The idea behind the certified build of Akka.NET is to make it easier to support; each Petabridge support subscription uses a certified build of Akka.NET which is authenticode signed and (optionally) strong named.

Our certified build is also subjected to additional testing and certification beyond the open source implementation before it’s released (specifically, it’s integrated and deployed into supported production environments and run under continuous load prior to being certified.)

Right now the certified build is limited to just the core Akka.NET modules but we will be adding support for specific plug-ins as-needed.

Developer Support

The first flavor of support Petabridge offers is “developer support” - this support plan is designed to assist Petabridge customers with design and developer activities to help head off issues before you go into production.

Each support customer can expect to have their design and development questions answered and issues resolved by an Akka.NET expert promptly.

Production Support

For customers who are already live in production Petabridge offers “production support” for them, to troubleshoot issues that occur in production in real-time. We guarantee fast turn-around times and the ability to get a live human being on the phone promptly (depending on your Service Level Agreement) if an issue occurs.

All of these services should help give any organization looking to leverage Akka.NET in production...

Distributing State in Akka.Cluster Applications

Consistent Hash Distributions and Clustered Routers

One of the most frequently asked questions about Akka.Cluster I receive is “how do I reliably distribute state in an Akka.NET Cluster?”

Akka.Cluster is primarily for building highly available, soft real-time applications in server-side environments - and one of the concepts that is essential to delivering “soft real-time” is statefulness.

Stateful applications are becoming more and more common because they execute types of work that are infeasible and impractical with stateless CRUD applications, but they also introduce new types of challenges such as:

  • How do I evenly distribute state across my cluster? No “hotspots.”
  • How do I find the state I need within my cluster?
  • What happens to my state if a stateful node goes down?
  • How do I guarantee that my state is modified safely? Consistent histories for state, in other words.

We can address, at a high level, all of these questions using a tool built into Akka.Cluster: consistent hash routers and Cluster.Sharding.

As of a few moments ago, we released Akka.NET 1.1 - the biggest feature release we’ve done for Akka.NET since releasing 1.0 last year! We have other major Akka.NET feature releases planned for later this year, but this is the first and one of the most long-awaited ones.

Akka.Cluster is released from beta

The biggest change in this release is the first stable release of Akka.Cluster, which has been in various beta stages since August 2014. During that time it’s been used as a beta package by hundreds of users who have given the Akka.NET project large amounts of bug reports and feedback.

Since that time we’ve covered Akka.Cluster in a huge range of multi-node tests, designed to ensure the cluster behaves correctly under a variety of network conditions (including some rather hostile ones) and it’s performed well.

We’ve also replaced the underlying Helios 1.4.1 transport with a brand new Helios 2.1.1 transport, which delivers up to 5x the throughput with a tremendously lower memory footprint than the previous versions.

Release of the Multi-node TestKit, Multi-node Test Runner

One tool that has proven utterly indispensable in the development of Akka.Cluster, Akka.Remote, Akka.Cluster.Tools, and Akka.Cluster.Sharding is the Akka.Remote.TestKit package - commonly referred to as the “multi-node testkit.”

This library is an extension of the Akka.TestKit that developers use for unit testing simple actors, and it offers capabilities designed for facilitating distributed unit tests for Akka.NET ActorSystems that are using Akka.Remote, Akka.Cluster, or any of the other high availability (HA) modules.

The Akka.Remote.TestKit is designed to allow you to do the to following:

  1. Run a unit test across multiple processes simultaneously, simulating how servers or virtual machines would behave in the real-world;
  2. Offers a dead-simple Domain Specific Language (DSL) that allows...

It’s been a while since we’ve published an official roadmap update for Akka.NET. We are still on track to achieve the goals of the previous roadmap, but with a few minor changes that I will explain here.

Akka.NET 1.1 - Akka.Cluster Release to Market; Akka.Streams Beta

We’ve publicly committed to releasing Akka.NET 1.1 on June 14th, 2016:

This release has the following goals:

  1. Officially releasing Akka.Cluster to market, signifying “it is ready for full-blown production use;”
  2. Deploy Helios 2.0 transport to production, which is significantly faster, more memory efficient, and more reliable than the current Helios 1.4.1-based transport;
  3. Releasing the MultinodeTestRunner and the Akka.Remote.TestKit, used for testing distributed systems built with Akka.NET; and
  4. Releasing the very first beta of the new Akka.Streams module, which you can read more about here.

Akka.Cluster has been available as a beta package for nearly two years and has had thousands of users. It is currently serving production workloads both on Linux and on Windows for a variety of different types of customers. During this period we have collected lots of bug reports, feedback, and data that has been used to help improve its reliability and performance.

This will be a tremendous opportunity for Akka.NET users to build high availability systems of all shapes and sizes on any cloud they wish.

Akka.NET 1.5 - TLS, New Serializer, Faster Transports

The next major release we have planned following Akka.NET 1.1 is Akka.NET 1.5. This release will introduce some breaking changes at the dependency level.

We are making the following two important changes:

    ...

The Business Case for Actors and Akka.NET

From the 1980s to Present Day

Akka.NET is a .NET implementation of the actor model.

The actor model is an old technology, originating in 1973 as an approach to parallel computing at a time when it looked like the computers of the future might be constructed using thousands of small, low-powered CPUs. History didn’t turn out that way thanks to Moore’s Law; CPUs became faster and faster and modern machines were developed with a small number of very high-powered CPUs.

Despite that, the actor model is immensely popular and runs some of the world’s most important software today. Amazon’s SimpleDb, RabbitMQ, Riak, CouchBase, Goldman Sachs, Motorola, Blizzard Games, Cisco, eBay, Credit Suisse, AMN Healthcare, Bank of America, McGraw Hill Financial, and scores of other major organizations use implementations of the actor model to power mission-critical applications responsible for the world’s largest companies.

So why is the actor model so popular today? Why are so many businesses using it for mission-critical applications?

First Adopters of the Actor Model: Telecoms

The truth of the matter is, the actor model has been popular for a long time through the Erlang programming language. Erlang was the first large-scale, production usable implementation of the actor model - developed originally by Joe Armstrong as a proprietary language at Ericsson in 1986 (open sourced later) to build telephone exchanges. Today it’s used to power the GPRS, 3G, and LTE cellular networks that depend Ericsson’s products.

Erlang Logo

Although the actor model was originally developed as a means for running applications on types of computer hardware that never really took off, the emergence of electronic computer networks in the late 70s and early 80s gave the actor model an extremely viable commercial application: distributed and concurrent systems.

As the Internet grew and more...

Performance Testing Should be Mandatory

Plus, How to Actually do it Right

Back in December I released the first publicly available version of NBench - Petabridge’s automated .NET performance testing and benchmarking framework.

NBench Logo

NBench has proven itself to be an invaluable part of our QA process for Akka.NET and scores of other projects, for one critical reason: performance is a mission critical feature for an increasingly large number of applications. And if you can’t measure performance, then you’re shipping a totally untested feature to your end-users.

The Impact of Poor Performance

A simple anecdote to illustrate the real-world impact of shipping non-performant software.

One of my favorite musicians, whom I have never seen live before, is coming to town and I wanted to purchase a ticket. I was out of the country the day tickets went on sale, so if I wanted to attend I’d need to buy a ticket from a secondary market.

I decided to give a new company I’d never purchased tickets through before, SeatGeek, a try. I quickly found two tickets for about $100 each, went through the checkout process, put in my payment information, and submitted payment. A few seconds later I get an error message back letting me know that the tickets were no longer available. So I repeat this process a few more times with progressively more expensive tickets with no success.

Eventually I just gave up and SeatGeek lost about $500 worth of revenue, because I lost any confidence that their reported ticket inventory was available. The crucial error was that the underlying software responsible for reporting inventory availability under-performed - it wasn’t able to keep up with the demand of actual customers, and as a result they nearly lost my business. I tried again on a whim immediately before writing this post and...

This is a follow-up to our last post, “How to Guarantee Delivery of Messages in Akka.NET.” In that post we introduced the AtLeastOnceDeliveryActor and talked about strategies for retrying deliveries of messages in order to make sure they’re successfully procssed.

In this post we’re going to talk about “At Least Once” delivery’s big brother, “Exactly Once” delivery - and why you should try to avoid it if at all possible.

A question we get asked about frequently with Akka.NET is “how can I guarantee that my messages will eventually be received and processed by another actor?” Most of the time it’s developers who work on finance applications who have this question, because each missed message means that someone’s accounting is off - but developers in lots of other domains have this issue too.

After last month’s successful Akka.NET virtual meetup, we’re going to be coming right back with another on on February 29th at 18:00 UTC. RSVP Here.

Update: thanks to everyone who attended! You can view the meetup below!